Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Anders Ossowicki <and@×××.dk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: OT: offensive (Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename)
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:49:33
Message-Id: 97a4d67e0803310049j34de0ae1jc7ecff5563141d7e@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: OT: offensive (Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename) by Thilo Bangert
1 On 31/03/2008, Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > > Please think things through before asking to have pkgcore's bugs
4 > > 'fixed' via specification next time...
5 >
6 > maybe my english language skills or social interaction qualities are
7 > failing me, but i find the above sentence highly offensive.
8
9
10 pkgcore crashes on ebuilds with explicit -r0 in the PV, which led to Brian
11 Harring bringing this entire discussion up in the first place. Rather than
12 getting pkgcore to handle -r0 correctly, he decided to try and get it banned
13 through the specification.
14
15 Please note, the above does not imply anything about my feelings towards the
16 original proposal, so please don't take it as such. I really couldn't care
17 less what you decide to do or not do.
18
19 am i too thin skinned for gentoo-dev?
20 >
21 > In this particular case, I'd say yes :-)
22
23 --
24 Anders Ossowicki <and@×××.dk>

Replies

Subject Author
Re: OT: offensive (Re: [gentoo-dev] explicit -r0 in ebuild filename) Patrick Lauer <bugs@××××××××××××××××××××××.org>