1 |
On Saturday 13 June 2009, Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
2 |
> One of the stronger points for collaborating at the source is that |
3 |
> poeple who are not Gentoo devs (yet) and therefore have no write |
4 |
> access to the Gentoo tree can still extend and fix the Gentoo |
5 |
> packagemap entries. Doing it downstream would hurt the whole project |
6 |
> in several ways. |
7 |
|
8 |
To drive the project forward and find cross-distro acceptance, the |
9 |
packagemap repo/server has to be the authorative source of information |
10 |
for distributions that participate. |
11 |
|
12 |
However, I see advantages in a distributed model to collect the |
13 |
information. Gentoo developers could feed <cpe> tags into the |
14 |
metadata.xml of the tree and do not need to sign up to commit to the |
15 |
third-party packagemap repository. Synchronizing changed tags to the |
16 |
packagemap repository should be easy to automate. Changes in the |
17 |
repository could be propagated back to the tree by a designated team of |
18 |
Gentoo developers interested in the packagemap project. |
19 |
|
20 |
I have a feeling other distributions might also favor a model where they |
21 |
have more control about the data without giving all their devs access |
22 |
to one big repo. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
Robert |