| 1 |
On Sunday 03 April 2005 01:51, Daniel Ostrow wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 11:41 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 16:35 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Seeing that I added that output, I guess I should reply. The reason for |
| 5 |
> > > it was that only one profile per keyword will be checked at the moment. |
| 6 |
> > > Essentially, the output was both to make people aware of this fact and |
| 7 |
> > > to make sure people know *which* profile is being checked. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > I figure your going to tell me that all listed profiles should be |
| 10 |
> > > checked and I'd have to agree so, if it'll prevent the addition of |
| 11 |
> > > another useless file, I guess I'll get right on it. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Give us a shout when you have something to test and I'll gladly fill up |
| 14 |
> > profiles.desc with the valid profiles. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I'm going to be making at least 2 dev profiles over the next week for |
| 17 |
> ppc64, glad that will be able to be checked. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Let us know when you need testers. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~jstubbs/repoman-2.0.51.19.patch |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Changes: |
| 24 |
* All profiles listed in profiles.desc are checked. |
| 25 |
* Masked packages are not checked unless --include-masked is specified, when |
| 26 |
- repoman is being called at category or tree level, and |
| 27 |
- commit has not been specified. |
| 28 |
* Removed several expensive but seemingly useless operation for a 90% speedup. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
With regard to the useless operations, they were there to restore the trees |
| 31 |
and config objects to initial state but I can't find anything that actually |
| 32 |
modifies their states. I ran a couple of category checks with and without the |
| 33 |
patch and didn't get any differing results, but keep your eyes open anyway. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Regards, |
| 36 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives