Archives
Archives
| From: | Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans | ||
| Date: | Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:04:46 | ||
| Message-Id: | 46320FDE.1090401@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans by "Petteri Räty" |
||
| 1 | Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 | > Why would the kernel have to go stable before the usual month dictated |
| 3 | > by policy? Yes there are usually security bugs but you did not mention |
| 4 | > that as a reason in your post. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | At last check this was a recommendation, not a policy, plus nobody |
| 7 | objected timeframe-wise before. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Also, as noted in my mail I anticipate this taking more than a week from |
| 10 | the point where we ask arch teams to consider stabling. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Daniel |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> |