| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 00:35 +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On ²áÚ, 2006-01-01 at 21:35 +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> We have currently 10371 ChangeLog files, > 25 MB totally . |
| 5 |
>>> 1365 == 13% with size >= 4096 B, 12 MB totally |
| 6 |
[...] |
| 7 |
> be benificial. The only question left to be answered is how much space |
| 8 |
> would actually be saved to make this extra load on CVS worth it. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
At the extreme of all ChangeLog moved in old there are 10371 more files |
| 12 |
in the tree, 25 MB less to check and to transfer (in case all the |
| 13 |
Changelogs are modified at the same time). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
In a more general scenario, only about 1300 Changelogs need to be |
| 16 |
transferred in ChangeLog.old, Leaving The total size of the Changelogs |
| 17 |
to about 18 MB instead of 25, with about 6 MB in ChangeLog.old (assuming |
| 18 |
no duplicated data). |
| 19 |
The Total number of ChangeLog* raise to 10371[norm] + 1365[.old] = 11736 |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
There is a overhead for user that not use rsync exclude and a noticeable |
| 22 |
gain for user that instead exclude ChangeLog.old . |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives