| 1 |
Why not good old version numbers? |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Maybe start at 1.5 if what would be Gentoo 2004 were earthshattering |
| 4 |
enough to warrant that, then just do 1.5.1, 1.5.2, 1.5.3, etc etc until |
| 5 |
there is another earth-shattering change like portage-ng maybe? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 01:37, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 8 |
> On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 03:10, Matt Thrailkill wrote: |
| 9 |
> > A couple things: |
| 10 |
> > Versions named by year? Thats always been a pet peeve I had with other |
| 11 |
> > programs... is this now set in stone for Gentoo? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Do you have a better suggestion? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives