1 |
One other rhetorical question: |
2 |
|
3 |
Wouldn't it make sense for Gentoo to buy other gentoo related names (e.g. |
4 |
gentoo.com, gentoo.net, gentoo-for-money.com) in order to prevent other |
5 |
companies from registering those names and claiming to be affiliated with |
6 |
Gentoo Technologies? Why, then, would registration of other domains be proof |
7 |
of devious motives? |
8 |
|
9 |
On Monday 04 February 2002 12:42 pm, you wrote: |
10 |
> Hi Daniel, |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Thanks, for writing but again you're avoiding the question, for example a |
13 |
> quote from your website: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> "Gentoo Linux is a versatile and fast, completely free x86-based Linux |
16 |
> distribution" |
17 |
> |
18 |
> will it stay completely free, if so and considering you are not a charity |
19 |
> how do you plan to make money? I assume you do plan to make money out of |
20 |
> the distro? |
21 |
> |
22 |
> "For the most part, these expenses have been coming out of my and our |
23 |
> volunteer network admin's pockets" - This sounds like you are generous, |
24 |
> good spirited, etc. But actually this is true for any startup company, |
25 |
> would I have volenteered or donated money to the startup company called |
26 |
> microsoft, I don't think so. So again if you want to be treated |
27 |
> differently to any other startup company, I think you need to explain how |
28 |
> you are different to the other startup companies. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Does Gentoo Technologies own any domains other than gentoo.org? |
31 |
> |
32 |
> And a final point to Chuck Haines, I'm not critising the quality of the |
33 |
> distro, quite the opposite, the portage system is one of the cleaverest, |
34 |
> best designed, therotically superior pieces of software I've seen. I quite |
35 |
> sure the rest of the distro is of equal quaility. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Regards, |
38 |
> David Herbert |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
> ----- Original Message ----- |
42 |
> From: "Daniel Robbins" <drobbins@g.o> |
43 |
> To: <gentoo-dev@g.o> |
44 |
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:20 PM |
45 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Ethical Policy |
46 |
> |
47 |
> > On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 06:59, David Herbert wrote: |
48 |
> > > Call me paranoid but before putting effort into gentoo I would like to |
49 |
> |
50 |
> know more about who gentoo is. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> > > You're a .org but are you actually a charity? |
53 |
> > |
54 |
> > No, we're not a charity but we accept donations to help offset |
55 |
> > development/hosting/hardware costs. For the most part, these expenses |
56 |
> > have been coming out of my and our volunteer network admin's pockets. |
57 |
> > The "donate" button is there so that those who enjoy Gentoo Linux can |
58 |
> > freely offer their support for our project. |
59 |
> > |
60 |
> > > What is your relationship to gentoo.com? |
61 |
> > |
62 |
> > Our domain names both have "gentoo" in them. |
63 |
> > |
64 |
> > > What is your relationship with IBM? |
65 |
> > |
66 |
> > None, other than I do contract work for them (indirectly) to pay my |
67 |
> > bills. |
68 |
> > |
69 |
> > > I suppose I'm looking for a statement akin to debian's social contract, |
70 |
> |
71 |
> because at present any ethics (which to me is the whole point of linux) are |
72 |
> only implied. |
73 |
> |
74 |
> > I don't think that a Gentoo Linux social contract would necessarily be a |
75 |
> > bad thing. However, from past experience I've found that these kinds of |
76 |
> > written "ethical guidelines" are often not followed or respected. I |
77 |
> > also don't see anything in the Debian Social Contract that is anything |
78 |
> > special. "We won't hide problems"? Isn't this stuff kind of obvious |
79 |
> > for a free software project? But there are some good things in there. |
80 |
> > I don't really see this as a "social contract" (since it's not as if |
81 |
> > it's enforceable), but more like design/policy guidelines. |
82 |
> > |
83 |
> > > Also it would be nice to have a global option (in /etc/make.conf ?) for |
84 |
> |
85 |
> allowing only GPL'ed software, GPL + other "open source" licences, or any |
86 |
> licence - so the end user can decide. |
87 |
> |
88 |
> > Yes, we plan to add that feature at some point. |
89 |
> > |
90 |
> > Best Regards, |
91 |
> > |
92 |
> > -- |
93 |
> > Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
94 |
> > Chief Architect/President http://www.gentoo.org |
95 |
> > Gentoo Technologies, Inc. |
96 |
> > |
97 |
> > _______________________________________________ |
98 |
> > gentoo-dev mailing list |
99 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o |
100 |
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
101 |
> |
102 |
> _______________________________________________ |
103 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
104 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
105 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |