1 |
Achim Gottinger wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Kyung-hwan Kim wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:15:59AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote: |
6 |
> > > Hi folks, |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > During compilation here I found that latest binutils segfault's during |
9 |
> > > linking of mpeg2_movie so it seems to be abit buggy. |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > > With Glibc-2.2.2 some packages like daemontools/pam needs to be patched |
12 |
> > > to compile since there where some so |
13 |
> > > called header cleanups done in this release. |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > Please use glibc-2.2.1 and binutils-2.1.10 until I have updated all |
16 |
> > > packages that needs patching. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > I merged glibc-2.2.2 two days ago. |
19 |
> > Files including ls, make, tar... got segmentation fault and failed. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Hmm seems like the uploaded package was build with binutils-2.1.10. |
22 |
> I made a new package for binutils-2.1.10.91.0.2 that fixes some ld |
23 |
> segfaults. |
24 |
> With that binutils version I build a new glibc-2.2.2 package (r1). |
25 |
> This should not give you segfaults. It works here for me. But many packages |
26 |
> do not compile |
27 |
> with glibc-2.2.2 because the headers have changed. |
28 |
|
29 |
!!!!! Please wait till tomorrow it seems there is a bug in portage-1.4 that |
30 |
prevents merge from working. |
31 |
So this glibc-2.2.2-r1 package was build with binutils-2.1.10 too and you |
32 |
sould not use it! |
33 |
|
34 |
achim~ |
35 |
|
36 |
> |
37 |
> |
38 |
> achim~ |
39 |
> |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > Is there any dependence about glibc? |
43 |
> > Or safe way to test new glibc/binutils and packages which is dependent |
44 |
> > on them? |
45 |
> > |
46 |
> > Kyunghwan Kim |
47 |
> > |
48 |
> > _______________________________________________ |
49 |
> > gentoo-dev mailing list |
50 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o |
51 |
> > http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
52 |
> |
53 |
> _______________________________________________ |
54 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
55 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
56 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |