| 1 |
Kyung-hwan Kim wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:15:59AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Hi folks, |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > During compilation here I found that latest binutils segfault's during |
| 7 |
> > linking of mpeg2_movie so it seems to be abit buggy. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > With Glibc-2.2.2 some packages like daemontools/pam needs to be patched |
| 10 |
> > to compile since there where some so |
| 11 |
> > called header cleanups done in this release. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Please use glibc-2.2.1 and binutils-2.1.10 until I have updated all |
| 14 |
> > packages that needs patching. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I merged glibc-2.2.2 two days ago. |
| 17 |
> Files including ls, make, tar... got segmentation fault and failed. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Hmm seems like the uploaded package was build with binutils-2.1.10. |
| 20 |
I made a new package for binutils-2.1.10.91.0.2 that fixes some ld |
| 21 |
segfaults. |
| 22 |
With that binutils version I build a new glibc-2.2.2 package (r1). |
| 23 |
This should not give you segfaults. It works here for me. But many packages |
| 24 |
do not compile |
| 25 |
with glibc-2.2.2 because the headers have changed. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
achim~ |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Is there any dependence about glibc? |
| 32 |
> Or safe way to test new glibc/binutils and packages which is dependent |
| 33 |
> on them? |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Kyunghwan Kim |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 38 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 39 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 40 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives