Archives
Archives
| From: | Kyung-hwan Kim <redjade@××××××××××××.kr> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre | ||
| Date: | Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:49:07 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20010221024947.A7139@rouge.snu.ac.kr | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre by 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger) | ||
| 1 | On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:15:59AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote: |
| 2 | > Hi folks, |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > During compilation here I found that latest binutils segfault's during |
| 5 | > linking of mpeg2_movie so it seems to be abit buggy. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > With Glibc-2.2.2 some packages like daemontools/pam needs to be patched |
| 8 | > to compile since there where some so |
| 9 | > called header cleanups done in this release. |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > Please use glibc-2.2.1 and binutils-2.1.10 until I have updated all |
| 12 | > packages that needs patching. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | I merged glibc-2.2.2 two days ago. |
| 15 | Files including ls, make, tar... got segmentation fault and failed. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Is there any dependence about glibc? |
| 18 | Or safe way to test new glibc/binutils and packages which is dependent |
| 19 | on them? |
| 20 | |
| 21 | Kyunghwan Kim |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre | 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger) |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre | 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger) |