Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:48:46
Message-Id: 3A9350B7.41261D7A@gottinger.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre by Kyung-hwan Kim
1 Kyung-hwan Kim wrote:
2
3 > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:15:59AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote:
4 > > Hi folks,
5 > >
6 > > During compilation here I found that latest binutils segfault's during
7 > > linking of mpeg2_movie so it seems to be abit buggy.
8 > >
9 > > With Glibc-2.2.2 some packages like daemontools/pam needs to be patched
10 > > to compile since there where some so
11 > > called header cleanups done in this release.
12 > >
13 > > Please use glibc-2.2.1 and binutils-2.1.10 until I have updated all
14 > > packages that needs patching.
15 >
16 > I merged glibc-2.2.2 two days ago.
17 > Files including ls, make, tar... got segmentation fault and failed.
18 >
19
20 Did you compile it or did you use the package from gentoo-updates?
21
22 >
23 > Is there any dependence about glibc?
24
25 Everything depends on glibc. :-)
26
27 >
28 > Or safe way to test new glibc/binutils and packages which is dependent
29 > on them?
30
31 I will upload a build environment this week. This can be used for such
32 tests.
33
34 >
35 >
36
37 achim~
38
39 >
40 > Kyunghwan Kim
41 >
42 > _______________________________________________
43 > gentoo-dev mailing list
44 > gentoo-dev@g.o
45 > http://www.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.2 / binutils-2.1.10.0.7 are incompatible/buggy!!!!! Don't use them on rc4_pre Kyung-hwan Kim <redjade@××××××××××××.kr>