Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: wolf31o2@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Proposal - Feedback Requested
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 07:07:08
Message-Id: 200605300914.01794.kugelfang@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Proposal - Feedback Requested by Mike Kelly
1 Hello Mike,
2
3 Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 05:29 schrieb Mike Kelly:
4 > I'm Mike Kelly, one of the SoC-ers. I'll be working on GLEP 27 for
5 > the summer. Right now I'm looking for some basic feedback on my
6 > proposal.
7 >
8 > In particular, I know that at one point there was a push for the user
9 > info files to be XML, but I think it may be easier to implement them
10 > as simple shell variable files (like /etc/conf.d/*), since my plan
11 > was to write the core of the implementation in shell (e.g. as an
12 > eclass).
13 >
14 >From your proposal:
15
16 - Add code to the eutils.eclass which will detect if the installed
17 version of portage supports the new system, notifies the operator
18 that the current ebuild is using depreciated code, and properly add
19 the user using the new system's code. This would check for the
20 proper EAPI version to know when to execute the new code instead.
21
22 As a member of Release Engineering who encountered already a problem
23 with user-management code in eutils.eclass, i beg you: _pleeeease_
24 don't add it to that eclass. Instead, create a new eclass 'euser' or
25 something similar and add it there.
26
27 Danny
28 --
29 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
30 Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
31
32 --
33 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27 Proposal - Feedback Requested Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>