| 1 |
On 21:56 Fri 21 Jan , Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01/21/11 21:35, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 3 |
> > gentoo-portage.git [2] |
| 4 |
> > gentoo-portage-historical.git [2] |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > [..] |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > [2] This is an idea where I'd like to place the main tree, and the |
| 9 |
> > additional graftable tree with the full history. I'm not entirely |
| 10 |
> > happy with this location, and WELCOME suggestions to improve it. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I would prefer something like "gentoo-main" or "main-tree" over |
| 13 |
> "gentoo-portage" as could would help reducing the problem of mixing up |
| 14 |
> our main tree and one of our package managers. If it actually is the |
| 15 |
> main tree, why not put that in the name. Thanks for consideration. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Sweet, we actually got an invitation to bikeshed! Here's my contributions: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
gentoo-tree.git |
| 20 |
gentoo-portage-tree.git |
| 21 |
portage-tree.git |
| 22 |
(the name 'portage' derives from bsd ports, so it makes sense to keep |
| 23 |
that connection to make it recognizable to that audience) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Thanks, |
| 27 |
Donnie |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 30 |
Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 31 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.com |
Archives