Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Piotr Jaroszyński" <peper@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tests
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 22:50:46
Message-Id: 200705020047.42172.peper@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] tests by Josh Saddler
1 On Wednesday 02 of May 2007 00:28:42 Josh Saddler wrote:
2 > Not a knee jerk reaction, just a strong one. One of the key reasons why
3 > mandatory tests were not desired was the fact that sometimes much more
4 > stuff will be installed than what you'd normally get. Exhibit A:
5 > robbat2's message just sent on diradm that normally just needs openldap
6 > with USE=minimal, but building for tests requires all of openldap,
7 > samba, etc.
8 Where did you read that this thread is about forcing tests? That was the black
9 and white approach and we all know how it failed... The purpose of this
10 discussion is to figure out a compromise between the current state and force
11 all, because neither of them is good.
12
13 --
14 Best Regards,
15 Piotr Jaroszyński
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list