| 1 |
W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze: |
| 2 |
> It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64 because |
| 3 |
> it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I believe it would be |
| 4 |
> beneficial for people if they wouldn't have to wait for arches that |
| 5 |
> don't affect them at all. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> It seems better if the packages can be unmasked for x86 and amd64 and |
| 8 |
> only kept hard-masked for ppc/ppc64 while they wait for keywords. |
| 9 |
> Otherwise, all arches will feel the effect of the slowest one without |
| 10 |
> there being a need for this. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
I don't know what gave you the idea that ppc* has anything to do with |
| 14 |
masking/unmasking of KDE-4.6. Just 2 facts: |
| 15 |
1) you can unmask anything by using /etc/portage/package.unmask, |
| 16 |
therefore nothing can ever hold *you* back |
| 17 |
2) arches already have independent package.mask files, see |
| 18 |
${PORTDIR}/profiles/arch/powerpc/package.mask for an example. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Kacper Kowalik |
Archives