Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Portage einfo, elog... output format change
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 18:33:14
Message-Id: CAAr7Pr9guvpOrwKsm4gJcp-d-JTXrBsebns7HfYoT=LNeU7Fzg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Portage einfo, elog... output format change by A Schenck
1 On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 11:30 AM A Schenck <lane_andrew@×××××××.com> wrote:
2 >
3 > On 9/29/21 11:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
4 > > On Thu, 2021-09-30 at 08:40 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
5 > >> Hi,
6 > >>
7 > >> Would it be possible to have some switch (e.g. --style=legacy) that
8 > >> controls this new vs. the old behaviour? Would perhaps allow
9 > >> applications that parse the output to work via setting this in the
10 > >> global opts.
11 > > Patches welcome. It shouldn't be hard, my commit shows which files need
12 > > to be edited to alter the prefixes and how to pass them into ebd.
13 >
14 > Would it be possible to get this patch in an format that it can be
15 > interacted with with open tools? Per the other branch of this thread,
16 > we'd be happy to make this an opt-in so as to not break existing people.
17
18 I'm not sure what you mean; you can download the PR...
19
20 https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/759
21
22 -A
23
24 >
25 > -A
26 >
27 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Portage einfo, elog... output format change A Schenck <lane_andrew@×××××××.com>