Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] lsh (and liboop) on Gentoo
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 20:50:05
Message-Id: 200309171650.11515.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] lsh (and liboop) on Gentoo by Alexander Gretencord
1 On Wednesday 17 September 2003 13:05, Alexander Gretencord wrote:
2 > On Wednesday 17 September 2003 03:32, Mike Frysinger wrote:
3 > > with all this openssh crap thats been happening today, i was wondering if
4 > > anyone made ebuilds for lsh (and thus liboop) for Gentoo ... i was
5 > > looking at liboop and they use the autotools pretty poorly imho ...
6 >
7 > Well there are ebuilds in bugzilla but carpaski set them to fixed without
8 > bothering to add them to the official portage tree as noone seemed to be
9 > interested in those ebuilds. Maybe you have better luck this time. Tell us
10 > about the bug report here so we can all post, so it gets in this time :)
11
12 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28971
13
14 > > i made a few patches so as to make those aspects optional, but i cant get
15 > > the autotools to regenerate the Makefile.in and configure files correctly
16 >
17 > Well if you figure it out, send the patches to the maintainers, they
18 > probably just didn't add such things as nobody complained and they don't
19 > see a need for that. Was the same with a DESTDIR variable in chrony until I
20 > wanted to make an ebuild. Richard was quite pleased with the patch once he
21 > saw the need for that.
22
23 yeah i usually do ... i just hate it when a package goes unmaintained upstream
24 and we have to basically sit on the patches ;(
25
26 -mike