| 1 |
On Sunday 07 September 2003 18:28, Martin Schlemmer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ok, but .rpm/.deb have the same kind of flaws ... |
| 3 |
Absolutly correct. Thats why i dont use them. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> From here on I can |
| 6 |
> only see that you can use LFS or such, that you can make sure everything |
| 7 |
> is ok. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> PS: How are you going to verify that gcc's cvs repo was not |
| 10 |
> compromised? |
| 11 |
Thats very realistic and compromise of at least the gnu ftp server happened |
| 12 |
not so long ago. I see the FSF to be responsible for handling this. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Or the kernel's ? |
| 15 |
Thats the responsibility of kernel.org. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
gentoo is responsible for portage and what portage does. Thats what i would |
| 18 |
like to discuss here. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> I guess you are going to |
| 21 |
> start coding you own kernel, tool-chain and the rest even |
| 22 |
> sooner now that we know how flawed linux, gnuish apps, etc |
| 23 |
> are. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
:) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
alternatives there are, so many of them, i just have to choose and i already |
| 28 |
did. No need for me to write my own os :) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives