Archives
Archives
| From: | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] x-modular.eclass: A modified approach to EAPI support | ||
| Date: | Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:06:52 | ||
| Message-Id: | 8b4c83ad0903070206l78e79fefl2247371c9a5a6376@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] x-modular.eclass: A modified approach to EAPI support by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | >>>>>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2009, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | >> Any thoughts? |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | >> + *) |
| 7 | >> + die "Unknown EAPI ${EAPI}" |
| 8 | >> + ;; |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > Is is safe to assume that an unknown EAPI will provide a "die" |
| 11 | > function? |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | |
| 14 | If we get all Ciaran-ey about that, then we can't even assume the |
| 15 | existence of a case statement in some future version of bash (which is |
| 16 | required by some EAPI) |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | ~Nirbheek Chauhan |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] x-modular.eclass: A modified approach to EAPI support | Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o> |