1 |
Don't blame it on the west, Mr Smith :) |
2 |
|
3 |
I wasn't [originally] trying to blame anybody, I was originally trying to |
4 |
tell the person I thought had made the mistake (via the Changelog) to please |
5 |
fix it asap (hence my direct CC) rather than have that person have to wait |
6 |
and wade through the list. |
7 |
|
8 |
No matter which longitude the attitude comes from, the bug needs fixing, but |
9 |
more importantly, the bug should never have made into stable. This really |
10 |
should be an effort to shore up quality control, no blame attributed to |
11 |
anybody in particular. The result should be that a mistake is learned from, |
12 |
not ignored. Daniel says that it won't be ignored, so I am very happy with |
13 |
that response. |
14 |
|
15 |
Tom Veldhouse |
16 |
|
17 |
----- Original Message ----- |
18 |
From: "Henti Smith" <bain@×××××××.za> |
19 |
To: "Daniel Robbins" <drobbins@g.o> |
20 |
Cc: <veldy@×××××.net>; <aurelien@×××××.org>; <kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr>; |
21 |
<gentoo-dev@g.o>; <manson@g.o> |
22 |
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:17 PM |
23 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
> On 17 Dec 2002 09:10:23 -0700 |
27 |
> Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> wrote: |
28 |
> |
29 |
> > I really dislike this whole theme of finding the "culprit," since I |
30 |
> > don't think it's helpful. If you're interested, you can view the |
31 |
> > ChangeLogs here: |
32 |
> |
33 |
> A typical western attitude. Something is broken/wrong find somebody to |
34 |
blame. |
35 |
> Addapt an eastern attidute. Something is broken/wrong fix it no need to |
36 |
blame anybody |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Henti Smith |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |