| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
George Shapovalov wrote: |
| 5 |
> Sunday, 17. June 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) Ви написали: |
| 6 |
>> I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building and |
| 7 |
>> installing something and then using that to build something else. Is there |
| 8 |
>> a standard way to do this? |
| 9 |
> I'd say - split the package in two (or how many pieces there are). Such |
| 10 |
> procedure implies that the parts are already well isolated, so the split |
| 11 |
> should not be that hard to do. Trying to force it "in one go" is not trivial |
| 12 |
> usually, unless what you are talking about is some bootstrap procedure. |
| 13 |
> However in that case there should be a certain way of "proper bootstrapping" |
| 14 |
> for the package described in its install docs. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> George |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Splitting the package is a good idea indeed. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
If it is needed a bootstrapping , you could build a binary version of |
| 21 |
the necessary components of the package, that's what we do with ghc and |
| 22 |
many of the languages packages inside dev-lang. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Regards, |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
- -- |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org" |
| 29 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
iD8DBQFGdbYfaTNpke9pJcURAmm6AKCMZQZC6tvFbgHu9dUb0c8ahpQfIgCgiLMU |
| 35 |
YnKpHz22OvjdyYLlF8l7+9k= |
| 36 |
=99fq |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives