| 1 |
On Friday 16 September 2005 06:45 pm, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 16 September 2005 23:50, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > actually, going with say 'testing.mask' instead of '?arch' may be better |
| 4 |
> > ... reinforce the fact that this is a package-level issue rather than |
| 5 |
> > arch-specific |
| 6 |
> > -mike |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> That's nearly as bad as having to deal with package.mask all the time. |
| 9 |
> Keeping the maintainer's opinion on an ebuild outside of it doesn't make |
| 10 |
> any sense. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
maybe, but considering we're talking about testing on a package level and not |
| 13 |
an arch level, either solution has its failings |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
i dont really care either way so long as we have a new level of control |
| 16 |
-mike |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives