| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 27.01.2018 17:32, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 5 |
> If you do merge them, then it might be better to use flags for the |
| 6 |
> different sub-packages rather than slots. There's no place to describe |
| 7 |
> what a slot is for, but having a local USE=solar with a corresponding |
| 8 |
> description in metadata.xml is (relatively) discoverable. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
use flags work well if we make a single ebuild offering to install one |
| 11 |
to all of these. That would be natural if the goddard/13 source rpm |
| 12 |
included files of constantine/12 and solar/11 as well and so on but it |
| 13 |
doesn't seem to. I would rather go with one ebuild per mayor release |
| 14 |
number of Fedora: Needs less use flag configuration as well. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
About slot names, if "12" is not good enough we could use |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
11-solar |
| 19 |
12-constantine |
| 20 |
13-goddard |
| 21 |
14-laughlin |
| 22 |
15-lovelock |
| 23 |
16-verne |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
or so for SLOT to have a mapping to names? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Best |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Sebastian |
Archives