| 1 |
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
| 5 |
> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) |
| 7 |
> >> <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> >> > patrick 14/12/31 05:21:11 |
| 9 |
> >> > |
| 10 |
> >> > Removed: ChangeLog Manifest libusbhp-1.0.2.ebuild |
| 11 |
> >> > metadata.xml |
| 12 |
> >> > Log: |
| 13 |
> >> > QA: Remove package with invalid copyright |
| 14 |
> >> |
| 15 |
> >> you do not go reverting code without actually talking to people. if |
| 16 |
> >> you feel like a revert is necessary, then file a bug. putting a "QA" |
| 17 |
> >> tag at the start of the commit message doesn't give you a pass. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > Normally I'd side with you on this...but I'm fairly sure repoman doesn't |
| 20 |
> let |
| 21 |
> > you commit packages to the tree missing these headers. This leads me to |
| 22 |
> > believe you didn't use repoman, or ignored it? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> feel free to grab the code i originally committed and run `repoman |
| 25 |
> full` yourself. no fatal errors. in fact you can see the generated |
| 26 |
> tags in my commit message. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Seems like a bug worth fixing then. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> even then, deleting an ebuild purely due to different copyright is |
| 34 |
> complete bs. anyone who understands copyright knows the situation in |
| 35 |
> Gentoo is completely unenforceable. we have no CLA. this was |
| 36 |
> patrick/QA wasting people's time to check a meaningless box. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Well we agree there, although I doubt anyone will bother fixing it ;) |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-A |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
> -mike |
| 45 |
> |
| 46 |
> |
Archives