Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:02:11
Message-Id: 20140721230158.3ee7e0d9@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps by hasufell
1 On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:28:24 +0000
2 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > We have:
5 > * a broken PM which does incomplete dep calculation, gives wrong
6 > suggestions to the user, has totally useless error/debug output,
7 > randomly fails to remove files, allows to break your system in
8 > numerous ways and whatnot... and I'm not going through bugzilla now
9 > to prove it
10 > * overcomplex eclasses, because people try to avoid getting stuff into
11 > the PM, resulting in more confusion for the PM
12 > * repeatedly broken stable packages
13 > * people coding against a PM instead of PMS and thus relying on
14 > undocumented behavior and breaking the "meta-distribution" part of
15 > gentoo
16 > * a PM codebase no one wants to be involved in
17
18 So you suggest we work around a bug in the PM which would be a single
19 fix. Everywhere.
20
21
22 jer

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>