1 |
Thomas Anderson wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Tiziano Muller(dev-zero) banned igli from #-council for what he called |
4 |
> repeated trolling after private warnings. |
5 |
|
6 |
This is inaccurate, and to be frank, a lie. |
7 |
|
8 |
dev-zero was placed on /ignore by me a couple of weeks previously after |
9 |
unwelcome /msg'ing wrt dev ML, that he was told was unwelcome, which he |
10 |
refused to respect. That was the ONLY private discussion we had and had |
11 |
nothing to do with #-council. |
12 |
|
13 |
Furthermore, he only banned me 8 hours after I had left the channel. |
14 |
|
15 |
Additionally, his user-rel issue was only raised AFTER I had raised the |
16 |
above in #-devrel, a process he chose to ignore until raising in userrel |
17 |
a couple of hours later, and then later trying to turn #-council into |
18 |
#-userrel, pretending the devrel issue had never occurred. |
19 |
|
20 |
(In the interests of accuracy I should point out it was +q not +b.) |
21 |
|
22 |
If I thought you had both time and inclination to actually reign your |
23 |
developers in when they step out of line, I'd file a devrel bug against him. |
24 |
As it is, I don't have the time to be insulted on bugzilla as well as |
25 |
online, and am just glad there is an election on; none of the user-rel |
26 |
people I spoke to afterwards knew anything about raising it with you for |
27 |
review; they only asked for the ban to be rescinded, which it was. |
28 |
|
29 |
I'd like to ask prospective Council members to answer the question I posted |
30 |
in my last mail to -project (which I assume you guys read. If not, I suggest |
31 |
new members consider keeping up to date with it, since many externals find |
32 |
dev to be beyond the pale. It's not just your developers who get put off by |
33 |
the nonsense.) |
34 |
|
35 |
What you put in your summary concerns me an awful lot less than the constant |
36 |
kowtowing to a supposed authority figure who on inspection is just another |
37 |
student, making all the classic student mistakes. It's not like others |
38 |
haven't pointed this out to you over and over; maybe you should start to |
39 |
consider it for a change? |
40 |
|
41 |
OK, put it this way: how offended do you think dev-zero would have felt if I |
42 |
had spoken to him in the way ciaranm addressed trelane in #-council over |
43 |
the last week or two? Or I'm sure anyone can find PLENTY of examples from |
44 |
this ML. |
45 |
|
46 |
Odd that CoC doesn't apply, but others are held up to a much higher standard |
47 |
and indeed treated most unfairly by people in positions of authority |
48 |
abusing that position for partisan aims. |
49 |
|
50 |
And sorry, tanderson, but consider my words of support for your campaign |
51 |
rescinded after the concerted nature of your part in the politicking. You |
52 |
clearly have a year or two more of growing-up to do, minimum, AFAIC. |
53 |
Lovey-dovey words about all getting along and documentation, are not |
54 |
sufficient to hold up to the rigours of the process you wish to lead. |
55 |
|
56 |
I'll chalk it up to inexperience on your part, as I know your heart is in |
57 |
the right place. If I'm wrong, feel free to flame me and I'll revise my |
58 |
opinion. Nice summaries though. |
59 |
|
60 |
/me looks forward to seeing gentoofan on the Council in a week or three and |
61 |
even more to quoting ciara at dev-zero. |
62 |
|
63 |
(It's OK, it's a joke.) |
64 |
-- |
65 |
#friendly-coders -- We're friendly but we're not /that/ friendly ;-) |