Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nathan Sullivan <nathan@××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing the metastructure (was: [Council] Summary of the last meeting)
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 01:08:42
Message-Id: 88830b6c0610251804t109f534fgd10045448a27fec1@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing the metastructure (was: [Council] Summary of the last meeting) by Grant Goodyear
1 i just noticed mx2.gentoo.org isnt responding on port 25, shouldnt it be?
2 defeats the purpose of backup MX if its not respond :)
3
4 CpuID.
5
6 On 10/26/06, Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> wrote:
7 >
8 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Wed Oct 25 2006, 11:17:09AM CDT]
9 > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:48:57 -0500 Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
10 > > wrote:
11 > > | (Incidentally, I apologize for missing the meeting. I was in
12 > > | intensely boring radiation safety training.)
13 > >
14 > > Uh, isn't boring a good thing when it comes to things involving
15 > > radiation?
16 >
17 > Yes, when you're handling actual nukes (nuclear sources). No, when it's
18 > the fourth eight-hour day of explaining how the keys to nuclear safety
19 > are distance (farther is better, and exposure is an inverse square law),
20 > time (shorter is better), and shielding (more is better, and use plastic
21 > or water to stop neutrons, not lead).
22 >
23 > Meanwhile, I received this reply to my e-mail well before the actual
24 > e-mail. Anybody know what's causing these e-mail issues? Now that we
25 > have trustees in place, would ordering new boxes help?
26 >
27 > -g2boojum-
28 > --
29 > Grant Goodyear
30 > Gentoo Developer
31 > g2boojum@g.o
32 > http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
33 > GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
34 >
35 >
36 >