Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is X86 uclibc environment supported?
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 22:31:47
Message-Id: 1ED6FC32-9C72-455C-8A3F-DA8D08E3AA9A@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is X86 uclibc environment supported? by "Anthony G. Basile"
1 Quote: blueness:
2 >
3 > The big problem is going to be the migration. You can't just unmerge
4 > uclibc and emerge uclibc-ng. The two hard block one another for that
5 > reason. The migration path I took is really really dirty but works:
6 >
7 > 1. ebuild uclibc-ng-<version>.ebuild clean install
8 > 3. Copy .so files from /var/tmp/portage/.../image/lib to /lib
9 > Since the .so versions are different they won't overwrite.
10 > 4. Use a static binary to switch over the sym links to the new .so's
11 > 5. emerge uclibc-ng properly
12 > 6. re-emerge world
13 >
14 > I can automate some of that with scripts, but it will take care on the
15 > part of the user who should be ready to boot off of rescue media. I'm
16 > going to recommend that people really avoid that if possible and start anew.
17 >
18
19 What about a "unclibc-ng-migrator" ebuild that would do steps 1,3,4 above if uclibc-ng isn't installed yet, and be a no-op otherwise? This could be a dep of uclibc-ng, and not hard-block uclibc. A bit hackish but emerge would probably enforce the order of things ok with deptree resolution.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is X86 uclibc environment supported? "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>