1 |
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:11:53PM +0000, Markos Chandras wrote: |
2 |
> Hi there, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> The official policy for live ebuilds is the following one: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/functions/src_unpack/cvs-sources/index.html |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I don't quite agree with this policy and I guess most of you don't agree |
9 |
> either looking at the number of live ebuilds/package.mask entries. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> My proposal is to keep empty keywords on live ebuilds without masking |
12 |
> them via package.mask |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Users interpret this as a 'double masking' which in fact it is since |
15 |
> they need to touch two files before they are able to use the package. |
16 |
|
17 |
I agree. Forcing the users to add ${P} ** in their keywords is enough, |
18 |
it states that "they're on their own". |
19 |
|
20 |
> I also know that we can use overlays for that, but distribute the |
21 |
> ebuilds among dev/proj overlays is not always a solution. |
22 |
|
23 |
+1 |
24 |
|
25 |
for big projects like KDE, overlays are a better place, but for small |
26 |
packages, they are overkill. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Alex Alexander | wired |
30 |
+ Gentoo Linux Developer |
31 |
++ www.linuxized.com |