Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainership and commit policy
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 12:42:35
Message-Id: 01080520573600.00739@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainership and commit policy by Ben Lutgens
1 On Sunday 05 August 2001 18:58, you wrote:
2 > On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 10:30:05PM -0600, Parag Mehta wrote:
3 > >Hi,
4 > >
5 > >With due respects to all developers, and the thread that has been going
6 > > on, following is my 2 cents for the same :
7 >
8 > I fear that this is quickly going to turn into the same issues seen with
9 > debian's overly "democratic" mentality. They vote and bicker about
10 > everything. While I agree that input is good. Ultimately this is not
11 > exactly a community project. We are almost all volunteers and should keep
12 > that in mind when putting forth our input.
13 >
14 > IMHO put forth your .02 and leave it at that. I think we should have the
15 > ability to share our input then let Daniel and Achim and the others make
16 > all the decisions (or delegate as they see fit)
17 >
18 > I'd really hate to see us denigrate into the bickering that goes on on
19 > debian-devel....
20 >
21 > Oh and by the by I am not in favor of several trees. Too many moving
22 > pieces. That's what cvs tags are for.
23
24 That's probably what I meant. I'm not sure about cvs terminology, thanks for
25 the correction.
26
27
28 --
29
30 Dan Armak
31 Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
32 Matan, Israel