| 1 |
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Yes, if you can please work on updating it. Please contact us on the |
| 3 |
> gentoo-portage-dev mail list or irc #gentoo-portage for changes to |
| 4 |
> portage that will help keep it working in the future. I started |
| 5 |
> development of a public_api branch long ago just for having a stable |
| 6 |
> API for apps to use. Perhaps some of what you need can be integrated |
| 7 |
> there. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Seems like a valuable tool. It would be best if it could either use |
| 10 |
portage APIs where available, or if effort could be directed at |
| 11 |
incorporating the necessary features into portage or its APIs so that |
| 12 |
you're not stuck maintaining a fork. I'm sure the portage team will |
| 13 |
help where they can. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Rich |
Archives