Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Александр Берсенев" <bay@×××××××××.ru>
To: "gentoo-dev@l.g.o" <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:28:16
Message-Id: CAPomEdyn-MLi30C8o6JU3PSEODkvwi9mLQwyOfd5guB-H=BE8Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting by Rich Freeman
1 Ok, I'll work on it.
2
3
4 2014-02-13 23:00 GMT+06:00 Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>:
5
6 > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote:
7 > > Yes, if you can please work on updating it. Please contact us on the
8 > > gentoo-portage-dev mail list or irc #gentoo-portage for changes to
9 > > portage that will help keep it working in the future. I started
10 > > development of a public_api branch long ago just for having a stable
11 > > API for apps to use. Perhaps some of what you need can be integrated
12 > > there.
13 >
14 > Seems like a valuable tool. It would be best if it could either use
15 > portage APIs where available, or if effort could be directed at
16 > incorporating the necessary features into portage or its APIs so that
17 > you're not stuck maintaining a fork. I'm sure the portage team will
18 > help where they can.
19 >
20 > Rich
21 >
22 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting Greg Turner <gmt@×××××.us>