| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Friday 03 October 2003 11:58 pm, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 5 |
> I would be quite violently opposed to removing kernel sources entirely from |
| 6 |
> portage. genkernel may be nice as an option for users who wish it. Do not |
| 7 |
> force me to use it, however. |
| 8 |
Is there any reason the Linux sources need to be included as an ebuild any |
| 9 |
more than, for example, the sources for Portage or Apache? You could always |
| 10 |
use ebuild to unpack into /var/tmp/portage and do the compile step yourself. |
| 11 |
However, I do think it would be a good idea to have some way of installing the |
| 12 |
source for any ebuild into /usr/src. Maybe Portage can check and if the |
| 13 |
package name ends with -src, it trims it, only does an unpack and merges the |
| 14 |
- -src to /usr/src/ebuildname or something? |
| 15 |
- -- |
| 16 |
Luke-Jr |
| 17 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 18 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 19 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
iD8DBQE/fhEgZl/BHdU+lYMRAhK0AJ9YDnNq5YcXWokerT92r/CB9QMcWgCfWGj7 |
| 23 |
FiqGOLvinUcPqov+5nkH6qA= |
| 24 |
=Qv9+ |
| 25 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives