| 1 |
On 27 July 2014 02:12, Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Do not forget modification of eclasses which then require mass bumps! |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I'm curious what the -r1.1 technique would do here. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I mean, wouldn't that mean you have 2 ebuilds that are identical except for |
| 10 |
the '.1' simply due to the eclass change? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That's going to be confusing. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-r1.1 weirdness feels like it may cause more problems than it solves. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Kent |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
*KENTNL* - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |
Archives