Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thierry Carrez <koon@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Signing everything, for fun and for profit
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 08:21:50
Message-Id: 446ECF96.9090607@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Signing everything, for fun and for profit by Patrick Lauer
1 Patrick Lauer wrote:
2
3 > Signing strategies
4 > ==================
5 >
6 > Once there is an agreement on what files to sign with what kind of keys
7 > there remains the question how to sign it. There are at least three
8 > strategies:
9 > [...]
10
11 I prefer a semi-secure solution appearing soon rather than waiting
12 another three+ years for a potentially better solution.
13
14 Currently users only have two choices :
15
16 - masterkey-signed portage snapshots
17 - unsigned (and so, insecure) rsync mirrors
18
19 This is obviously not satisfying.
20
21 It has taken years to try to get per-developer signing implemented,
22 without success. We should try to do masterkey signing ("simple" method)
23 and see if we go somewhere. It's is so much better than nothing.
24
25 So I would rather work on ensuring everything in portage gets properly
26 signed rather than designing key policies, cross-signing strategies and
27 ways to force developers to sign properly. Given the current state of
28 Gentoo it is a much more reachable goal.
29
30 --
31 Thierry Carrez (Koon)
32 Gentoo Security Team and Gentoo Council Member
33 --
34 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Signing everything, for fun and for profit Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>