Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Philippe Lafoucrière" <lafou@×××××××.fr>
To: Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr>
Cc: Gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games
Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 08:48:16
Message-Id: 1062838094.2983.1.camel@biproc
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games by Thomas de Grenier de Latour
1 > I don't think it's enough. Warnings are just... warnings, and things are
2 > not supposed to be broken if you ignore it. And for many people, it is
3 > redirected to /dev/null by a cron job command. Mike's suggestion of
4 > having two trees coexisting during the transition process sounds more
5 > reasonnable to me.
6
7 And what about a world dependancy that would contain portage ? Any
8 emerge of a package would upgrade portage if there's an available
9 update.
10
11
12 --
13 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list