Archives
Archives
| From: | Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games | ||
| Date: | Fri, 05 Sep 2003 18:33:20 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20030905203951.6b60abed.degrenier@easyconnect.fr | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games by "Philippe Lafoucrière" |
||
| 1 | On 05 Sep 2003 10:15:03 +0200 |
| 2 | Philippe Lafoucrière <lafou@×××××××.fr> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > You won't have the new tree until a sync or rsync. there, a message |
| 5 | > will warn you (as every time) to update portage. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I don't think it's enough. Warnings are just... warnings, and things are |
| 8 | not supposed to be broken if you ignore it. And for many people, it is |
| 9 | redirected to /dev/null by a cron job command. Mike's suggestion of |
| 10 | having two trees coexisting during the transition process sounds more |
| 11 | reasonnable to me. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | TGL. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games | Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games | "Philippe Lafoucrière" <lafou@×××××××.fr> |