Archives
Archives
| From: | "Philippe Lafoucrière" <lafou@×××××××.fr> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> | ||
| Cc: | Gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games | ||
| Date: | Fri, 05 Sep 2003 08:15:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1062749703.2935.1.camel@biproc | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games by Thomas de Grenier de Latour |
||
| 1 | > I don't see the main difficulty in modifying portage, but rather in |
| 2 | > doing the transition to the new tree without breaking backward |
| 3 | > compatibility with old installed portage versions. There are some |
| 4 | > people, especialy those who run gentoo on production servers, who don't |
| 5 | > do their weekly deep update :/ |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I'm the one who proposed the 2 levels a long time ago for zope & apache |
| 8 | stuff. I don't see the problem with backward compatibility ?? |
| 9 | You won't have the new tree until a sync or rsync. there, a message will |
| 10 | warn you (as every time) to update portage. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games | Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> |