From: | Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games | ||
Date: | Thu, 04 Sep 2003 20:07:55 | ||
Message-Id: | 20030904221405.6f2b9f22.degrenier@easyconnect.fr | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games by Camille Huot |
1 | On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 21:45:30 +0200 |
2 | Camille Huot <cam@××××××.net> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > sounds nice. I think there is some work to be done to portage to get |
5 | > this working. |
6 | |
7 | I don't see the main difficulty in modifying portage, but rather in |
8 | doing the transition to the new tree without breaking backward |
9 | compatibility with old installed portage versions. There are some |
10 | people, especialy those who run gentoo on production servers, who don't |
11 | do their weekly deep update :/ |
12 | |
13 | -- |
14 | TGL. |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Breaking up the beast known as app-games | "Philippe Lafoucrière" <lafou@×××××××.fr> |