1 |
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:15:52PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
> OK. I've been looking at some of these issues we've been having, and |
3 |
> I've been thinking of moving enewuser, egetent, and enewgroup to their |
4 |
> own eclass. This will resolve some issues with things in system, or |
5 |
> otherwise early on, requiring shadow on Linux to get useradd. Two |
6 |
> examples of this are bug #113298 and bug #94745. By putting them in |
7 |
> their own eclass, we can keep from adding shadow to DEPEND in eutils, |
8 |
> while still putting the dependency in the eclass that uses it. |
9 |
|
10 |
i think i suggested this somewhere before, but why dont we just add |
11 |
shadow to packages.build ... then it'll be in stage[123] and the DEPEND |
12 |
will be a moot point |
13 |
-mike |
14 |
-- |
15 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |