| 1 |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:56:23 -0700 |
| 2 |
Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> * easy to shoehorn in for any profile.bashrc compliant manager |
| 4 |
> (portage/pkgcore); realize paludis is left out here (via it |
| 5 |
> intentionally being left out of PMS atm by ciaran), but |
| 6 |
> profile.bashrc *is* used by ebuild devs, thus it's a viable course (I |
| 7 |
> don't see profile.bashrc ever going away basically). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
If profile.bashrc is to be kept, it means massively reducing what can |
| 10 |
be done in there. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> * doesn't address versioning changes. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Or indeed any change where the ebuild can't be visible to older package |
| 15 |
managers without breaking them. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So basically it's not a solution at all. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives