| 1 |
Dnia 26 stycznia 2016 13:36:00 CET, Davide Pesavento <pesa@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 2 |
>On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Justin Lecher <jlec@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@g.o> |
| 4 |
>> --- |
| 5 |
>> eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 2 +- |
| 6 |
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass |
| 9 |
>> index 01de9a5..23339ab 100644 |
| 10 |
>> --- a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass |
| 11 |
>> +++ b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass |
| 12 |
>> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ _CMAKE_UTILS_ECLASS=1 |
| 13 |
>> # for econf and is needed to pass TRY_RUN results when |
| 14 |
>cross-compiling. |
| 15 |
>> # Should be set by user in a per-package basis in |
| 16 |
>/etc/portage/package.env. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> -case ${EAPI} in |
| 19 |
>> +case ${EAPI:-0} in |
| 20 |
>> 2|3|4|5|6) : ;; |
| 21 |
>> *) die "EAPI=${EAPI:-0} is not supported" ;; |
| 22 |
>> esac |
| 23 |
>> -- |
| 24 |
>> 2.7.0 |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
>Why? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Indeed, why? I think it would be cleaner to simply quote the parameter to case. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Best regards, |
| 34 |
Michał Górny (by phone) |
Archives