| 1 |
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 6:10 PM Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 3 |
> > There is an open QA bug [1] regarding the large set of undocumented |
| 4 |
> > patches that are being applied in the stable ebuilds. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Arfrever is active in the bug you linked, has provided explanations |
| 7 |
> for the patches and prepared to restructure the patches so that they |
| 8 |
> can be gated by local USE flags, has made several different concrete |
| 9 |
> suggestions for possible implementations and requested feedback, but |
| 10 |
> has received no reply in the bug and instead there's now this |
| 11 |
> backstabbing discussion on this list. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
There was no visible progress on the bug for a month and a half. Some |
| 14 |
proposals/questions appeared once I suggested giving the package to |
| 15 |
someone else in IRC. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I don't wish to spend my time providing guidance that will likely be |
| 18 |
ignored and carefully reviewing his work on this package. I would much |
| 19 |
rather hand the package off to someone who can work on it without |
| 20 |
direct supervision. |
Archives