1 |
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:27:43PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
2 |
> No. LICENSE="GPL-2 some-exception" suffices. That said, we suck at our |
3 |
> licensing information badly. E.g. every single ebuild linking against OpenSSL |
4 |
> has (or at least needs to have) a linking exeption. We don't flag this |
5 |
> anywhere. More important, what's with optional dependencies!? We don't |
6 |
> support |
7 |
> |
8 |
> LICENSE="GPL-2 ssl? ( openssl-exception)" |
9 |
> |
10 |
> style LICENSE content at all iirc. Similar for all the patent-encumbered |
11 |
> multimedia libs, which can't be distributed as binaries, but are not blocked |
12 |
> by some bindist feature flag or so. |
13 |
> |
14 |
License follows the same syntax as DEPEND. See |
15 |
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/index.html#license. |
16 |
|
17 |
Regards, |
18 |
Bryan Østergaard |
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |