| 1 |
Le mercredi 10 mars 2010 à 18:04 -0500, Richard Freeman a écrit : |
| 2 |
> On 03/10/2010 04:42 PM, Duncan wrote: |
| 3 |
> > So a gmail account is now considered mandatory for Gentoo devs, at least |
| 4 |
> > if they want calendar access? |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > What about those who might think that Google knows enough about them with |
| 7 |
> > search and the web crawling and database correlation Google does, and |
| 8 |
> > whatever ad serving might leak thru, and object to having a gmail account |
| 9 |
> > on principle? |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Honestly, Google calendar works well enough that I'm not sure that I |
| 13 |
> like the idea of re-inventing the wheel. Maybe if somebody designed |
| 14 |
> some kind of open calendar access protocol that was comparable. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> If you don't like Google tracking all that you do, create a gmail |
| 17 |
> account and don't use it for ANYTHING but Google Calendar. That will |
| 18 |
> greatly limit the amount of database correlation they can do. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> If somebody has a suggestion for a reasonable multi-user calendaring |
| 21 |
> infrastructure that has reasonably close feature parity and isn't a bear |
| 22 |
> to maintain I'm sure it would be considered. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
that's called caldav. There's at least one opensource server that is |
| 25 |
working decently well with evolution although it's in php. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 29 |
Gentoo |
Archives