Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:17:06
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > Well, if it's in ~arch it's a candidate to go to stable after further
3 > testing. If a package maintainer isn't prepared to have a package moved
4 > to stable, they shouldn't take it out of package.mask.
6 The 30 days are just a rule, there are enough packages which surely need a
7 longer testing period, even if they work flawlessly. Or would you mark gcc 4.0
8 stable after 30 days? I think that's what Paul wanted to say.
10 --
11 Simon Stelling
12 Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead
13 blubb@g.o
14 --
15 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>