| 1 |
11.08.2015 16:30, Michael Palimaka пишет: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Don't forget that as a project with no special authority, Qt's policy |
| 4 |
> remains a suggestion for the vast majority of maintainers. If someone |
| 5 |
> wishes to provide support for only one Qt version or abuse their users |
| 6 |
> with REQUIRED_USE they are still free to do so. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Not enforcing policies on main tree is a bad thing. If you make policy, |
| 10 |
make other maintainers follow it. I am not against consistent policy |
| 11 |
that ease life BOTH for developers and users. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
You think that REQUIRED_USE is abusive to users: fine. Point accepted. |
| 14 |
I think that provided DEPEND strings if they will be typed at every |
| 15 |
single qt-related ebuild that needs them are abusive to developers. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So, maybe we should wrap them into eclass and stop riding our own |
| 18 |
bicycles... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
And then - use apropriate one-liner where it's needed, providing |
| 21 |
reasonable default and NOT confusing users with overmanaging their |
| 22 |
package.use |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 26 |
Gentoo developer |
| 27 |
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead |
| 28 |
Gentoo Quality Assurance project lead |
| 29 |
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead |
Archives