1 |
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:25:34 +1000 |
2 |
"Sam Jorna (wraeth)" <wraeth@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 09/08/17 10:43, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
5 |
> > Also your redistributing another's package |
6 |
> > in binary format which may not be legally allowed. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Just to clarify, I wasn't suggesting redistributing license-encumbered |
9 |
> packages. Since binary packages are managed by the system |
10 |
> administrator, not Gentoo (as a distro), it remains with the |
11 |
> administrator to adhere to any relevant license restrictions. Plus |
12 |
> the package manager can't tell if you're distributing binaries or not. |
13 |
|
14 |
Sure, I was just pointing out that there maybe legal needs to prevent |
15 |
such. Unless someone wants to circumvent. Their call but not default. |
16 |
|
17 |
The package manager knows about fetch restricted ebuilds. It should |
18 |
not to re-package that stuff. IMHO |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |