Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Fernando J. Pereda" <ferdy@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:55:59
Message-Id: AA210A3E-F10A-4C9B-A0F0-79F03564FF6E@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees by Luca Barbato
1 On 14 Jun 2008, at 19:36, Luca Barbato wrote:
2
3 > Bernd Steinhauser wrote:
4 >>>> With your approach, we would have to fix the version after every
5 >>>> 4.1.x release. That sounds awful, tbh. So:
6 >>>
7 >>> No that enforce people update the deps or at least gives one more
8 >>> reason to do. Keep in mind that -9999, -scm ebuild or .live
9 >>> templates aren't for public consumption.
10 >> Except, that it is not that easy.
11 >> The point of time where you have to update your kde deps has
12 >> nothing to do with that.
13 >> This is why we recommend to always reinstall everything from kde svn.
14 >> It is even more likely, that these problems occur after the "bump",
15 >> that shouldn't have been one at all.
16 >
17 > emerge -C @kde-svn
18 >
19 > emerge @kde-svn
20 >
21 > that should suffice.
22
23 I don't see that working for something like, say, python or glibc.
24
25 - ferdy
26
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees Patrick Lauer <bugs@××××××××××××××××××××××.org>