Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:47:13
Message-Id: 20051120054441.GA17389@curie-int.vc.shawcable.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41 by Corey Shields
1 On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:04:13PM -0800, Corey Shields wrote:
2 > On Saturday 19 November 2005 08:50 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
3 > > Yeah, we defiantly could use a beefy new server for CVS/SVN. Just make
4 > > sure you chat with robbat2/Pylon on the specifics for the requirements.
5 > > I believe the main thing they wanted was lots of ram.
6 > As discussed before, the new dev will be a dual xeon 3.0/1M, 2GB ram, 6x146GB
7 > U320 scsi. adding more ram to this setup wouldn't be a problem. I'll cc
8 > them and ask how much ram hits the sweet spot and get a new quote this week.
9 4Gb of RAM would enable the current CVS speedups to continue, and also
10 allow for keeping all of the CVS/SVN trees (2Gb of data presently) in
11 the memory-cached files (important for speed).
12
13 The Xeon's need to be be HT-capable (the present ones are), as that
14 helps spread available CPU around the tasks that do use it better.
15
16 The 6x146GB is overkill for storage, unless you have some other plans
17 that I'm not aware of (I'm assuming RAID5 with a hot-spare, so 4x146GB
18 usable). 6x72GB might be more suitable for the budget.
19
20 --
21 Robin Hugh Johnson
22 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
23 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: implementation details for GLEP 41 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>